|
|
|
Focus on Caring As I looked through my internal mail one morning, I came across an incident report stating a female staff member had witnessed “inappropriate sexual behaviour” between two participants at a community event. She observed a male participant holding hands with a female participant throughout the afternoon and later kissing her. The report indicated that the participant was non-compliant to cues to cease hand-holding. The staff member requested direction on dealing with this situation. When I met with her to discuss the concerns, my question was “What is it about what you witnessed that was inappropriate?” She indicated that she felt that the participant should not be involved in a relationship with the young woman. As she said the words, she realized that it was not her decision to make and that this was an opportunity to support personal goals of our participants. The discussion quickly turned to identifying ways to support the participants with their consensual relationship. Too often, issues of sexuality and intimacy are overlooked, minimized, or suppressed in a rehabilitation setting. It is important to remember that young males between the ages of 18 and 30 are the most common victims of injury to the brain. This is the stage of life when men are experimenting with relationships and intimacy. Intimacy is one interaction that defines human experience. Therefore, to neglect or avoid the topic in rehabilitation fails to address the needs of the persons served. It is the role of caregivers/rehabilitation professionals to assist our clients with brain injuries to learn to develop relationships to whatever level their physical and/or cognitive abilities allow. Family members should feel comfortable requesting information of a treatment facility regarding how the direct care staff and the rest of the treatment team will address relationship and sexuality issues and concerns. Guardians or family members may wish to discuss their expectations in this regard, giving valuable input into treatment goals. Education, on all fronts, is essential. Concerned family members as well as front line staff need to be educated to the facts that the desire to be intimate and to express emotions are a natural course for everyone, whether there is a disability or not. All individuals, regardless of their handicap or disability, have a right to their sexuality and the right to develop meaningful relationships that may or may not be intimate in nature. Peggy: And, now we will hear from two other participants: Helping a person with brain injury achieve the goal of developing and maintaining meaningful relationships can be challenging. Following a brain injury, one of the most common deficits noted is the inability to inhibit thoughts and copes and (2) how the individual will adapt. When a traumatic event occurs within a family unit, coping and adaptation must occur in order to move forward and remain as a unit. Family coping is a specific effort, covert or overt, by which an individual family member or the family as a whole attempts to reduce or manage a demand on the family. Adaptation is defined as the outcome of family efforts to bring a new level of balance, harmony, coherence, and a satisfactory level of functioning to a family following a crisis situation (McCubbin & McCubbin, 1991). Through the wives’ adjustment group, we discovered that the individuals that reached out to each other and did the hard emotional and spiritual work of participating, completing weekly questionnaires, and journaling, were the individuals that were committed to reducing or managing the demands on their family. They were striving for adaptation, a level of harmony and balance in their family unit. When family adaptation occurs, even when brought about by only one family member, the groundwork is laid for the family to “redefine” itself and move on.
Did you know that people don’t “get over” a brain injury
like they recover from a broken leg or the chicken pox? Well, I didn’t.
He had made so much progress in rehab; he learned to walk, gained strength,
etc. I just couldn’t wait for us to get home so things could get
back to normal. Within the first 24 hours I had a pretty good idea that
things were very different. He continued to go to outpatient therapies
three or four days a week and it was About ten months out from my husband’s injury, I was afforded a great opportunity. It was a spousal support group just for wives of survivors of brain injury. Over a ten week period, we met once a week for two or more hours and discussed a different topic each week. It was a road trip to get there from where I lived, but it was worth every mile. There were other spouses and a facilitator in this group. Have you ever thought about the difference between sympathy and empathy? We ladies had a truckload of empathy for one another. I am blessed to have many close and caring friends. However, embarrassment or guilt kept some topics out of the conversations with them; but within this group – we shared everything, and I do mean everything! We became fast friends and I call them if I get in a tailspin. For example, I was devastated when my husband said, “I hope I don’t treat you the way you’ve treated me if you ever get sick. You were so wonderful to me in the hospital but that same person didn’t come home with me.” Even when I explained that he had five therapists helping him “get back,” and once at home I suddenly had to become all of those folks, his response was the same. I had to try to get him to do the exercises, both physical and mental. All that my former “high energy” husband wanted to do was eat, sleep, and watch TV. My empathetic friends helped me to realize that the anger directed at me was a normal reaction and that from now on, when he gets frustrated or angry, he will say the same things, be it old history or not. When we get back together, as we often do, to share our “Adventures
with the Brain Injured” and to give and take advice, it is like
we are Cheerios in an ocean of milk; we bobble, but we manage to stay
afloat. Sometimes the answers you get are not what you want to hear. On
one occasion I asked; “How long is it before you stop grieving everyday
for the person you’ve lost?” They answered that it had taken
them two to three years. I cried all the way home that night, but the
next day, I thought, “Hey! I’m halfway there!” I knew
there was hope! Conclusion “It helps knowing you are not the lone ranger.” With that
said, I hope that professionals and family members will responsibly take
this group model and customize it to meet the needs of your community.
Although a brain injury may have turned your world “upside-down,”
your world, and your life, did not stop turning. There is no grave to
stand beside and mourn; there is no memorial service to attend. You must
do your grieving and your celebrating of the life that is intact in your
own way – in the manner that makes sense to you and your family.
In the great words of Oprah Winfrey, never forget to
Cron, E.A. (2000). Couple Rating Scale: Clarifying problem areas. Family Journal, 8, 302. Hibbard, M.R., Gordon, W.A., Flanagan, S., Haddad, L., & Labinsky, E. (2000). Sexual dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation, 15, 107-120. Kruetzer, S.J. & Zasler, N.D. (1989). Psychosexual consequences of traumatic brain injury methodology and preliminary findings. Brain Injury, 3, 177-186. Kosciulek, J.F., & Lustig, D.C. (1999). Differentiation of three brain injury family types. Brain Injury, 13, 245-254. Kozloff, R.(1987). Networks of social support and the outcome from severe
head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2, McCubbin, M. A., & McCubbin, H.I. (1991). “Family stress theory and assessment: The Resiliency Model of family stress, adjustment, and adaptation.” In H.I. McCubbin & A.I. Thompson (Eds.), Family assessments inventories for research and practice (pp. 3-32). Madison, WI. Family Stress, Coping, and Health Project, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Merritt, L. (1999). Relationship issues in traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury Source, 3, 12-20. Rocchio, C. (1998). The family perspective on psychotherapy service. Brain Injury Source, 2, 36-37. Thomsen, I.V. (1984). Late outcome of very severe head trauma: A 10-15 year second follow-up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 47, 260-268. .............................. Permission to duplicate, reprint, or electronically reproduce any document in part or in its entirety may be obtained by written consent from the editors. Copyright © 2002 Premier Outlook. All rights reserved
|
|||||